On
the 12th of October in 1492, Christopher Columbus discovered San
Salvador, the Bahama Island's gateway to the Western Hemisphere. For the
next three days he carefully recorded his landfall's characteristics for
posterity, in particular the island's all-important harbor, which was
large enough for "as many ships as there are in the whole of
Christendom,” yet “no more disturbed than inside a well.” These
two seemingly contradictory descriptions appear hyperbolic at first
reading because it is physically impossible for a large body of water to
remain as smooth as a well's surface, especially when almost constantly
agitated by the unrelenting trade winds that sweep the Bahamas. The only
logical conclusion is that Columbus must have been describing two
distinct parts of that harbor; the first, an immense roadstead where
ships could ride safely at anchor while awaiting their turn to enter the
second part, a small inner harbor thoroughly sheltered from those
pervasive trade winds and oceanic surges. In fact, Columbus sometimes
did incorporate the outer roadstead when dimensioning a small protected
inner harbor as demonstrated by his December 21st sizing of tiny
“Puerto de la Mar de Santo Thomas” as “five leagues,” a span
which does just happen to precisely fit the length of its protected,
though unenclosed, outer roadstead.
While
a number of the Bahama Islands have enclosed inner harbors snuggled
behind large sheltered roadsteads, only a few of these are located near
eastern approaches to this archipelago. For example, Abaco Island offers
several suitable candidates, including Marsh Harbour and some of the
island's off-lying cays. However, these Abaco harbors are all far north
of the landfall latitude, and no reasonable track can be reconstructed
from any of them to his subsequent discoveries. Far to the south of the
landfall latitude, Cat and Long Islands each have several protected
inner harbors located behind outer roadsteads, but it becomes
even
more difficult to establish a reasonable track from any of these. None
of the favored landfall candidates, such as Watlings Island (“San
Salvador”), Conception, and Samana Cay have harbors that come close to
meeting the Columbus dual description. Some of the less known
candidates, such as Mayaguana and the Plana Cays don't even have a
harbor.
Only
one eastern Bahamas harbor satisfies both characteristics recorded by
Columbus, and it's located within easy range of the landfall latitude on
Eleuthera's Royal Island. This slender haven, shielded from the trade
winds by large trees and limestone ridges lining both sides of its
one-mile length, has a mirror-like surface that still beckons sailors to
a serene respite from Atlantic storms. It's aptly described in “The
Yachtsman's Guide” as “a beautiful, almost landlocked harbour that
offers protection in any weather.” This description is in marked
contrast to their observation that "There are no safe natural
harbours on San Salvador,” whose Columbus candidate, the exposed
Graham's Harbour, “always seems to carry a surge through it,”
clearly a failure to match the smooth surface of a well.
The
road stead fronting Royal Harbour also has room enough "for as many
ships as there are in the whole of Christendom.” This
centrally-located “laguna” offers ideal anchorage depths ranging
between 10 and 20 feet over an area of more than 25 square miles,
shielded to the east and south by Eleuthera to the north by a string of
overlapping islets, and to the west by an almost continuous reef. This
anchorage is actually much better protected than the smaller one on
Watlings Island posing as “Graham’s Harbour.” Thus, Royal Harbour
has a better match than Graham's Harbour with both parts of the Columbus
description, an advantage enhanced by the following additional landfall
evidence.
Landfall
Latitude - According to his own Journal, accurate latitude sailing would
have brought Columbus to northern Eleuthera, well within the 30-mile
navigation error his friend Bernaldez cited as the absolute maximum
limit for a competent pilot. An Abaco landfall would require twice this
level of error, and it would have to be tripled to accommodate a
landfall at Watlings Island.

Juan de la Cosa Map
A careful inspection of this small portion of the map will reveal
that Juan de la Cosa used the native names for the islands.
Juan
de la Cosa’s Map - This earliest surviving map of the western
hemisphere includes the only landfall image drawn by a voyage
participant. Despite its
small size, his quarter-inch drawing of the landfall island reveals some
unique congruences with Eleuthera's north coast, the route Columbus had
to follow in his search for a safe anchorage. These important features
include a narrow harbor entrance facing the trade winds (Harbour
Island), the extensive shallows behind that entrance, and an
equally-spaced triple-cusped shoreline matching Royal Island's unique
northern coast along its exact bearing line.
Las
Casas “Historia” - Unfortunately, Las Casas failed to include any
description from that momentous night's circuit of Eleuthera in his
Journal/ transcription. However, his later “Historia" does
dimension the landfall island as "45 miles,~ an excellent match
with the Eleuthera coastline Columbus would have viewed that night as he
sailed to its first reef opening at Egg Island. Every other landfall
candidate is far too small.
"una
laguna in medio muy grande” - This simple Spanish description of the
landfall island should be properly translated as "a large lagoon in
the center,” a phrase strongly congruent with the centrally located
road stead of northern Eleuthera. (This is not the only example of
Columbus using "laguna. to describe a road stead.) There is no
large lagoon on Watlings Island, and if any of its several lakes could
be considered "central,” this condition would not have been
evident to Columbus except from Indian maps, who's existence is
incompatible with several other claims of the Watlings theory. For this
reason, the many Watlings Island defenders have consistently pretended
"laguna. is "lago~ (lake) in their attempt to force fit this
important entry to their be ill-founded theory.
Sunday's
rowing expedition to survey the harbor - His final day on the landfall
island, Columbus organized a rowing expedition to survey for himself how
well this important harbor would serve future Spanish needs. “I looked
over the whole of that harbor and afterwards returned to the ship and
set sail.” His Egg Island
anchorage was three miles from Royal Harbour, so a complete survey on
its inner harbor would require less than eight miles of rowing,
comfortably within the capabilities of a crew that had not exercised the
required muscles for over a month. The postulated rowing route at
Watlings Island is 21 miles plus another six or more to “look over the
whole of that harbor.” The limited time span available for this
inspection trip implies that a relentless Columbus would have driven his
tired crewmen at three knots or more for a good part of the day at
Watlings Island.
“went
north northeast the length of the island....” - This harbor rowing
expedition was launched from his anchorage near the south end of Egg
Island, so Columbus had no choice but to follow the full length of its
(exact) NNE coastline. In marked contrast, the proposed rowing route at
Watlings is almost due north and only follows half the island's length.
This appears to be the reason Watlings advocates has consistently
misrendered “al luenga de la isla" as merely “along the
island.”
“...to
see the other part which was the eastern part, which it has.” This
immediately following text accurately describes his dory's arrival at
nearby Royal lsland, “the other part which was the eastern part, which
it has.” The Watlings theorists can't fit this precise description to
their candidate, so they have conveniently omitted the last part of the
phrase in order to pretend that Columbus was merely describing the
eastern end of their solitary island. Clearly, Columbus understood that
every island has an eastern side, so he wouldn't have appended the
specific “que habia” unless he intended to convey a more restrictive
meaning - one that only fits the Egg-Royal combination.
“some
of them brought us water" - For the first time the Indians of Royal
Island offered the Spaniards some of their potable water that was
copiously available on Royal Island, where they lived, but not on rocky
Egg Island, where they first greeted Columbus. In contrast, there's no
apparent reason for the Indians on Watlings Island to have avoided
offering water to these “men from heaven” until they were supposedly
rowing towards Graham's Harbour.
“called
to us in loud voices to come ashore. But I was afraid, seeing 'una
grande restinga de piedra' that encircled that island" - “Una
grande restinga de piedra" is a large rock ledge, usually above
water, but sometimes below water, if very close to shore.
Almost all of Royal Island's coast is a 6-foot-high ledge of
jagged aolian limestone markedly differing from Egg Island's more
hospitable shore. Ironically, this darkened limestone ledge must have
reminded Columbus of Cabo Restinga's volcanic ledge in southern Hierro,
his very last view of the Old World. Royal's jagged surface will still
cut through shoe leather, so it surely was threatening enough to keep
Columbus from accepting the native's invitation. The case for an
underwater ledge at Watlings Island is weak because its broken reef
clearly wouldn't have kept Columbus from coming ashore, even if he
actually had been stubborn enough to row outside it instead of taking
the shorter and easier route within its protective barrier.
"y
entremedias queda hondo y puerto” - Translation of “entremedias”
as “halfway” graphically pinpoints Royal Harbour's entrance as
midway down the island's southern coast. Watling's supporters prefer to
render this word as a fuzzier "between" the reef and the
shore, even though the missing word for "shore. must be inferred
here and such fuzzy descriptions were uncharacteristic of Columbus.
"and
the entrance to it is very narrow” - The narrow entrance to Royal
Harbour is less than 100 yards wide; the entrance to Graham's Harbour is
more than a mile in width.
"to
see where a fort could be made. And I saw a piece of land formed like an
island, although it was not one, on which there were six houses; it
could be converted into an island In two days" - While rowing back
to the ship, Columbus noticed that Rat Cay, a three-acre islet Iying
about 50 feet from the west end of Royal Island, was a strategic
location for a fort. But while it was "formed like an island” its
surrounding waters were so shallow that an enemy could easily wade
across to a future fort. However, he must have observed that the channel
bottom was soft marl in giving the very credible estimate that "it
could be converted into an island in two days.” The Watlings candidate
for this "island” is a mile-long treeless limestone peninsula
that couldn't be separated in less than two months, even with dynamite
and modern earth-moving equipment. Worse yet, this interpretation is
based entirely on Las Casas' marginal note “peninsula.” Both Las
Casas and the Watlings theory have ignored the simple fact that Columbus
surely included this word within his extensive geographical lexicon,
and, if appropriate, would have used it instead of his prolix 13-word
description of Rat Cay's quasi-island status.
“near
said islet, there are the loveliest group of trees that I have ever
seen”- At the west end of Royal Island there are now several acres of
coconut palms in an area protected from the trades winds and flat enough
to store its copious rainfall. Five hundred years ago its indigenous
trees clearly impressed Columbus and its fresh water was within 200
yards of those six houses on Rat Cay. In marked contrast, Watlings'
windswept peninsula is treeless, and the potable water needed at those six native dwellings is available only from modern wells.
The
evidence tying Columbus' harbor to Royal Harbour is strong and clear.
Correction of the historical record requires a new translation of the
Columbus Journal by unbiased scholars, and interpretation of that
translation by competent yachtsmen.

